Prediction of Elvina Kalieva [279th] vs Chelsea Fontenel [872nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L L W L L
Form
W L L W L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Kalieva 1 - 0 Fontenel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kalieva winning 2 and Fontenel winning 0. The last match between Kalieva and Fontenel was at the W35 Herrenschwanden, 06-02-2025, Second, Carpet with Elvina Kalieva getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Elvina Kalieva | 1 |
| Chelsea Fontenel | 0 |
| Kalieva | Stats | Fontenel |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (8-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (5-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 279 | Ranking | 872 |
| 168 | Highest Rank | 746 |
| 21 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 52% (146-137) | Career Total W/L | 44% (41-52) |
| $119,479 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:37:2 | Average Match Time | 1:37:2 |
| 65% (42/65) | 1st Serve % | 60% (39/65) |
| 69% (29/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (27/39) |
| 61% (14/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (10/26) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 43% (28/65) | Return Points Win % | 34% (22/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Elvina Kalieva vs Chelsea Fontenel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kalieva 1 - 0 Fontenel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kalieva has won 40.58% of points on their second serve, while Fontenel has won 36.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kalieva, in recent form, has won 50.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fontenel has won 53.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.6% and 29.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kalieva has saved 48.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fontenel has saved 51.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kalieva has won 48.53% of matches played (W/L 33/ 35), with Fontenel winning 40.54% (W/L 15/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kalieva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 76/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Fontenel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 21/ 23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 11/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Kalieva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.82% of matches (W/L 31/ 30), where as Fontenel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.18% of matches (W/L 14/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kalieva winning 1 times and Fontenel being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kalieva winning 2 and Fontenel winning 0. The last match between Kalieva and Fontenel was at the W35 Herrenschwanden, 06-02-2025, Second, Carpet with Elvina Kalieva getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kalieva and Fontenel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kalieva winning 0 times and Fontenel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kalieva winning 0, and Fontenel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kalieva has played against opponents with an average rank of 220.15 while Fontenel has played against players with an average rank of 249.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kalieva has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fontenel has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kalieva has converted 41.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fontenel has converted 37.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Elvina Kalieva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Elvina Kalieva
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Elvina Kalieva
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Hao-Ching Chan
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Elvina Kalieva
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Elvina Kalieva
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tyra Caterina Grant
Player
Elvina Kalieva
72%
(
80 of
111)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
8
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Elvina Kalieva
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Francesca Curmi
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elvina Kalieva
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chelsea Fontenel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riya Bhatia
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
53%
(
9 of
17)
1st Serve %
83%
(
15 of
18)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Adams
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Leilany Ipunesso
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Komal Nagare
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Bakhmutkina
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Anja Wildgruber
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Colmegna
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
92%
(
68 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
72 of
100)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Kalieva vs Fontenel?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Kalieva Vs Fontenel is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (146/137) | Win/Loss | 44% (41/52) |
| 51% (333/325) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (96/118) |
| 50% (3091/3035) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (984/1043) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 617 | Aces Total | 142 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1165 | Total Double Faults | 191 |
| 1:39:19 | Average Match Time | 1:22:56 |
| 269.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 240.91 |
| 56% (10217/18370) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3084/4751) |
| 62% (6321/10217) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1817/3084) |
| 45% (3682/8153) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (709/1666) |
| 47% (1096/2331) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (248/572) |
| 46% (8379/18349) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2137/4839) |
| 51% (141/278) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (41/92) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (26/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (10/16) |
| 53% (49/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (15/29) |
| 84% (140/117) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (39/34) |
| 16% (140/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (39/5) |
| 20% (143/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (54/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
